Skip to main content

Tastefully Yours (2025)

It’s not easy to like a show where the acting and script are not always in top form, but I liked it!



Beom-woo is a rather predictable character but Kang Ha-neul does a wonderful job being funny, silly, emotional, fed up and so on.  Never expected he'd fit comfortably in a comic role!



On the other hand, Yeon-joo, played by Go Min-si, unfortunately is the weak link, mostly flat and boring in character development and delivery.  A saving grace is that she is pretty, and the two are a photogenic couple. 



The secondary characters and cast easily outplayed her.  Kim Shin-rok is especially impressive as Myung-sook, who, like Beom-woo, comes across with her full range of emotions and expressions.  Choon-seung (played by Yoo Soo-bin) and Yoo-jin (played by Bae Yoo-ram, who was forgettable in Run On but gets a much more interesting role here) are suitably funny and silly.  



Mean mother Han (played by Oh Min-ae) is as mean as she was intended to be, and brother Sun-woo (played by Bae Na-ra) goes through at least a couple of phases in character development.  Was chef Young-hae (Hong Hwa-yeon) so extremely talented that she could replicate Yeon-joo’s dishes well without using all those fresh, home-grown ingredients, when Myung-sook, even with Yeon-joo’s supervision, sometimes makes mistakes? It felt like the show couldn’t decide whether she should be a funny or annoying person.  I think Hwa-yeon could have played either or both, so it is a pity the character wasn’t better developed.

 

Strange plot points

The whole Hokkaido sub-plot had little impact on the overall plot and felt like a complete waste of time.


a rather useless detour

The temple sub-plot was much more useful, though it showed up Yeon-joo’s underdevelopment and weak delivery even more.  The nuns and the monks with non-speaking roles were more animated and personable! 



Beom-woo’s “betrayal” was not a betrayal.  He did not steal the Jungjae recipes, did not tell or encourage Young-hae and Yoo-jin to do so and is not responsible for them breaking in.  


the much coveted recipe book

Furthermore, he tried to stop them from using the recipes.  Therefore, I don’t see why Yeon-joo should be heartbroken when it wasn’t his faultl.  His problem was that he hadn’t come clean early enough about his initial intention to steal the recipes, but it was obvious that he no longer wanted to and had nothing to do with the theft.  Easily verifiable.

 

Young-hae suddenly ups and leaves Motto, having realised she much prefers cooking her own recipes instead of stolen ones.  Yeon-joo tells her nun-mum that over time, she had learnt to focus on the people she is cooking for.  Errm… are these not what those who train in culinary skills know from the start??  Myung-sook is especially impressive in this area, as a treasured staff member of Choon-seung’s family restaurant and in customising the recipe to the ages of the judges of the lousy cook-off.  Does that make her the true chef of the show, then?!


The biggest let-down is how half of the main couple does little to make this rom-com a rom-com!  Yeon-joo is hardly funny and contributes almost nothing to the romance.  We can’t tell that she likes Beom-woo but she suddenly does and kisses him for nothing. 


 

The mother being so obsessed with her work and achievements that she neglects her sons is not and unheard of kind of mum in Kdrama, but why make the sons compete against each other?! Lovely that the brothers eventually find their way to more balanced and sane ways of doing things.  Also, nice to see that they jointly help to set up the restaurant chain for the man whose recipes Hansang stole and whose original restaurant it closed down.  No credit to their mother! 



There are too many missing links in this show.  Strange, but I enjoyed it despite its serious flaws, thanks mainly to the Jungjae support team of Beom-woo, Myung-sook and Choon-seung, who are the life and stars of the show.




Genie TV

10 episodes

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

True train school

‘Having eyes, but not seeing beauty; having ears, but not hearing music; having minds, but not perceiving truth; having hearts that are never moved and therefore never set on fire. These are the things to fear, said the headmaster.’ How would you like to have such a headmaster? I finally re-read (read it first as a teenager) Totto-chan, The Little Girl at the Window , a ‘school story’ by Tetsuko Kuroyanagi, translated by Dorothy Britton. Totto-chan is the name Tesuko Kuroyanagi called herself, and the book is about her life during her school days at Tomoe Gakuen. Totto-chan was expelled from her first elementary school because of her ‘disruptive’ behaviour, which included constantly opening and closing her desk top (because she was so thrilled by it), ‘vandalising’ her desk (because there wasn’t enough space on the piece of paper to draw) and standing by the classroom window waiting for street musicians to pass by or talking to swallows. Her mother, although probably alarmed about the ...

No wonder

According to a poll of about 300 people, reported in yesterday's Sunday Times, (how come nobody ever asks me these things?) , the Seven Wonders of Singapore are (in order of merit): 1. The Esplanade (a whopping 82 votes) 2. Changi Airport (53 votes) 3. Sentosa 4. The Merlion 5. The Singapore River 6. Food 7. Mount Faber and LKY (tie - 10 votes each) Some 'offbeat choices' which didn't make it to the top 7: aunties selling tissue paper at coffee shops, Singlish, kiasuism, 4D-Toto outlets and Newater (said someone of Newater: 'We are probably the only country with branded recycled sewage.' Well said, ha ha.). Maybe it's a personal bias but I feel that a 'Wonder' must also have strong historical and cultural/social value (so I'm rather miffed that Angkor Wat didn't make it to the 7 Wonders of the World; in fact it was never in the running for the top 7). Therefore, these choices are a little too modern for me. The Esplanade, for example, is a...

True train school - a bit more

I realise I didn't give the context of Totto-chan's story, so here it is: Mr Sosaku Kobayashi, the headmaster, started Tomoe Gakuen in 1937. Totto-chan was in school during the WWII years and the school was destroyed during the Tokyo air raids, before she completed elementary school. Here is something from the last chapter, entitled 'Sayonara, Sayonara!' "The school that had been the headmaster's dream was enveloped in flames... In the midst of it all, the headmaster stood in the road and watched Tomoe burn... 'What kind of school shall we build next?' he asked his university-student son Tomoe, who stood beside him. Tomoe listened to him dumbfounded. Mr Kobayashi's love for children and his passion for teaching were stronger than the flames now enveloping the school. The headmaster was cheerful." Indeed, a man ahead of his time. The school was never re-built, and Mr Kobayashi passed away in 1963. In her postscript, Tetsuko Kuroyanagi explained ...