Skip to main content

Taking a final bow

There's an article in today's Sunday Times entitled 'Did Andre stay too long?' It says that the legendary Andre Agassi 'ends career on low note by playing on despite age and injury'.

The article says that he should have left the stage 'on a high', i.e. when he was still winnng Slams. It points out that in the past two years, he has just had one 'sole' win (not a Slam). In comparison, others such as Pete Sampras and Agassi's wife Steffi Graf retired while they held Grand Slam titles. The writer says Steffi 'knew when to call it quits'.

I find the article rather disturbing. Why does winning have to be the end-all? Why does a sportsman have to end his career on a 'high'? Why can't he play for however long he wants to, even when he's never going to be #1 again?

I'm sure that in these last couple of years or so, Agassi and (most of) his fans were not deluded enough to think that he was going to win another Grand Slam. Yet, he continued on the tour. I can think of some possible reasons why he did that. However, why should we even be asking why? If he wanted to continue playing, why shouldn't he have continued playing?

And I really don't think his career ended on a low note. Instead, I think his last matches were respectable and dignified. His opponents gave him due respect, he gave them due credit. Most importantly, he obviously loves tennis. Isn't that what counts?

Comments

Anonymous said…
yes i totally. a sportman and different from, say a novelist. i think a writer who no longer has new insiration should end on a "high" (like 金庸)instead of writing all the old ideas into a new book. but a sportsman should be able to play for as long as he likes.
dee
Anonymous said…
Yup, Dee, after all, he still had fans paying to watch him play.

Popular posts from this blog

A lesson in love

I am a little pencil in the hand of a writing God who is sending a love letter to the world. -Mother Teresa Most of the time my eyes just glaze over when I see article upon article of football news. One caught my glazing eye over the weekend, though - 'De la Cruz - Mother Theresa in boots' , because of the familiar name. Mother Teresa, that is. It was the first time I’d ever heard of this de la Cruz guy, an EPL player who hails from Ecuador (GNI per capita US$2,630; as a comparison, Singapore’s is US$27, 490 – source: BBC country profiles ). His is a great story to illustrate that famous Chinese saying about not forgetting your roots. According to the article, ‘Each month a proportion of that salary (about S$150,000) Reading pay him - be it 10 per cent in January or 20 per cent in February - goes direct to the village’ (where he grew up). (Picture and profile from here ) Here's what he has been credited for: 1. 'The 2002 World Cup,' de la Cruz reflects, 'finan

True train school

‘Having eyes, but not seeing beauty; having ears, but not hearing music; having minds, but not perceiving truth; having hearts that are never moved and therefore never set on fire. These are the things to fear, said the headmaster.’ How would you like to have such a headmaster? I finally re-read (read it first as a teenager) Totto-chan, The Little Girl at the Window , a ‘school story’ by Tetsuko Kuroyanagi, translated by Dorothy Britton. Totto-chan is the name Tesuko Kuroyanagi called herself, and the book is about her life during her school days at Tomoe Gakuen. Totto-chan was expelled from her first elementary school because of her ‘disruptive’ behaviour, which included constantly opening and closing her desk top (because she was so thrilled by it), ‘vandalising’ her desk (because there wasn’t enough space on the piece of paper to draw) and standing by the classroom window waiting for street musicians to pass by or talking to swallows. Her mother, although probably alarmed about the

No wonder

According to a poll of about 300 people, reported in yesterday's Sunday Times, (how come nobody ever asks me these things?) , the Seven Wonders of Singapore are (in order of merit): 1. The Esplanade (a whopping 82 votes) 2. Changi Airport (53 votes) 3. Sentosa 4. The Merlion 5. The Singapore River 6. Food 7. Mount Faber and LKY (tie - 10 votes each) Some 'offbeat choices' which didn't make it to the top 7: aunties selling tissue paper at coffee shops, Singlish, kiasuism, 4D-Toto outlets and Newater (said someone of Newater: 'We are probably the only country with branded recycled sewage.' Well said, ha ha.). Maybe it's a personal bias but I feel that a 'Wonder' must also have strong historical and cultural/social value (so I'm rather miffed that Angkor Wat didn't make it to the 7 Wonders of the World; in fact it was never in the running for the top 7). Therefore, these choices are a little too modern for me. The Esplanade, for example, is a