Skip to main content

Handbag rules?

Are there rules for or against the use of handbags by schoolgirls? You know, like how there are rules against multiple earrings, coloured hair, nail polish, and, in my time, pom-pom socks - which I'm sure trendy young ladies nowadays wouldn't dream of using -, and other such 'fashionable' things?

I recently noticed some girls around here carrying handbags to school. For example, one girl carried a small handbag and a bigger bag for her school stuff. Then, there was this girl who had a small sling one and carried her files and books in her hand. And then, there was this girl who carried a (not very big) hobo type bag and I don't know where her books and files were. Maybe she rolled them and stuffed them into her bag or something. Is it the fashion these days?

I have nothing against bags, of course. Actually, I love bags. In fact, I think about clothesbagsshoes very, very often. And in fact, there are days when I think I'm obsessed with clothesbagsshoes.

Just wondering about school rules...

Comments

Anonymous said…
my opinion may be deemed a little "extreme" by some. i'm not imposing this on anyone, just stating my PERSONAL opinion. :)

i do not really support uniforms for schools. i know what are the reasons for uniforms, but do not think they are important enough for it. so in that sense, i also do not agree with the no nail polish/pompomsocks/coloured hair etc etc rules. what are these "physical appearance" rule for, UNLESS the student doesn't look neat and presentable? as long as they do their roles as students, i do not see what's the problem with say, pom pom socks? if someone can look neat and presentable with nail polish and coloured hair for a job interview, why can't a student do so in school? what has it to do with her learning?

a reason often given is that other students may be influenced/distracted by others in their class who do so. students in sg go home everyday and on weekends. they get their influence elsewhere even if not from school anyway.

personally i can never agree that to prevent someone from indulging in things they shouldn't or couldn't afford BY taking away that thing/influence. that's just a quick but not permanent solution. taking away undesirable options are suitable for babies only. awareness / education / counselling is a more effective longterm and permanent solution. if they can solve those almost IQ like maths questions at age 11, then they can understand, be counselled and given the choice for their dressing.
dee
Anonymous said…
I heard about some 'rules' for teachers too, e.g. multiple earrings and coloured hair.

But not about handbags, I think...

I suppose having more rules cuts down on the need to 'police' students. For example, the universities have dress codes, such as no slippers, etc, but I see students in slippers and my guess is nobody actually does 'policing' in the uni. In regular schools, however, if you have flexible dress codes, I'll bet it will become yet another of the teachers' many duties to check on their students' attire.

Popular posts from this blog

True train school

‘Having eyes, but not seeing beauty; having ears, but not hearing music; having minds, but not perceiving truth; having hearts that are never moved and therefore never set on fire. These are the things to fear, said the headmaster.’ How would you like to have such a headmaster? I finally re-read (read it first as a teenager) Totto-chan, The Little Girl at the Window , a ‘school story’ by Tetsuko Kuroyanagi, translated by Dorothy Britton. Totto-chan is the name Tesuko Kuroyanagi called herself, and the book is about her life during her school days at Tomoe Gakuen. Totto-chan was expelled from her first elementary school because of her ‘disruptive’ behaviour, which included constantly opening and closing her desk top (because she was so thrilled by it), ‘vandalising’ her desk (because there wasn’t enough space on the piece of paper to draw) and standing by the classroom window waiting for street musicians to pass by or talking to swallows. Her mother, although probably alarmed about the ...

No wonder

According to a poll of about 300 people, reported in yesterday's Sunday Times, (how come nobody ever asks me these things?) , the Seven Wonders of Singapore are (in order of merit): 1. The Esplanade (a whopping 82 votes) 2. Changi Airport (53 votes) 3. Sentosa 4. The Merlion 5. The Singapore River 6. Food 7. Mount Faber and LKY (tie - 10 votes each) Some 'offbeat choices' which didn't make it to the top 7: aunties selling tissue paper at coffee shops, Singlish, kiasuism, 4D-Toto outlets and Newater (said someone of Newater: 'We are probably the only country with branded recycled sewage.' Well said, ha ha.). Maybe it's a personal bias but I feel that a 'Wonder' must also have strong historical and cultural/social value (so I'm rather miffed that Angkor Wat didn't make it to the 7 Wonders of the World; in fact it was never in the running for the top 7). Therefore, these choices are a little too modern for me. The Esplanade, for example, is a...

He like dat say one meh?

Apparently, that 'English as it is broken' book has been topping the charts at our local bookstores. Actually, I'm not too interested in that book but this other one may be worth getting my hands on. The article about it, as published in Saturday's (1 Sept) ST: In the world of international diplomacy, the best-chosen words or phrases can leave an audience laughing, bewildered or simply lost in translation, an insider has revealed. Undiplomatic Activities, a yet-to-be-launched book by Mr Richard Woolcott, who ran Australia's foreign service for four years, points to the pitfalls of translating thoughts into different languages. Take the Australian diplomat in France who tried to tell his audience that as he looked back on his career, it was divided in two parts, with dull postings before life in Paris. 'When I look at my backside, I find it is divided into two parts,' Mr Woolcott quoted the diplomat as telling his highly amused audience. Ex-Australian prime m...