Skip to main content

Limits on liquids

Just read in the ST that we will start enforcing limits on liquids and gels on board planes only later in the year. It seems we are 'in no rush' to put this in place although the International Civil Aviation Organisation recommended last year that it be done by 1 March, i.e. today, and Japan, South Korea and Taiwan are doing it today, and Australia and NZ by the end of this month.

There are issues such as 'confusion and inconvenience' and 'degradation of service standards'. The ST article says that 'one area of concern is duty-free shopping'. According to the article, 'there is still much confusion over which duty-free items travellers can take with them. The confusion has hit duty-free sales at several airports.'

Well, well, I thought that terror threats were to be taken very seriously and all. Surely they supersede concerns about duty free profits?

Anyway, I also thought there are already solutions to that problem, as shown here.
That is, if you stop laughing and figure out carefully what to do about your duty-free purchases when reading these signs. Sorry about the lack of sharpness. Let me reproduce - verbatim - the text here, complete with italics and highlights.





"According to the latest information, US-bound passengers that bought liquids, gels and aerosols in the duty-free shops should take back all the items from our staffs by the receipt and your boarding pass at the podium before boarding.

Liquids, gels and aerosols purchased in the duty-free shops by Passengers transferring to USA by Northwest Airlines should be transported by the aviation company. Please leave them to the company staffs at the podium. (Pay attention to your boarding time)"

While I was standing for quite some time at this sign, people were giving me strange looks, and I don't blame them. I must have seemed rather odd because no one else was interested in it. I was just fascinated by the use of italics and highlights, etc.

Oh well, I suppose it's a good thing we are working towards implementing the new rules. Better than not implementing at all.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A lesson in love

I am a little pencil in the hand of a writing God who is sending a love letter to the world. -Mother Teresa Most of the time my eyes just glaze over when I see article upon article of football news. One caught my glazing eye over the weekend, though - 'De la Cruz - Mother Theresa in boots' , because of the familiar name. Mother Teresa, that is. It was the first time I’d ever heard of this de la Cruz guy, an EPL player who hails from Ecuador (GNI per capita US$2,630; as a comparison, Singapore’s is US$27, 490 – source: BBC country profiles ). His is a great story to illustrate that famous Chinese saying about not forgetting your roots. According to the article, ‘Each month a proportion of that salary (about S$150,000) Reading pay him - be it 10 per cent in January or 20 per cent in February - goes direct to the village’ (where he grew up). (Picture and profile from here ) Here's what he has been credited for: 1. 'The 2002 World Cup,' de la Cruz reflects, 'finan

True train school

‘Having eyes, but not seeing beauty; having ears, but not hearing music; having minds, but not perceiving truth; having hearts that are never moved and therefore never set on fire. These are the things to fear, said the headmaster.’ How would you like to have such a headmaster? I finally re-read (read it first as a teenager) Totto-chan, The Little Girl at the Window , a ‘school story’ by Tetsuko Kuroyanagi, translated by Dorothy Britton. Totto-chan is the name Tesuko Kuroyanagi called herself, and the book is about her life during her school days at Tomoe Gakuen. Totto-chan was expelled from her first elementary school because of her ‘disruptive’ behaviour, which included constantly opening and closing her desk top (because she was so thrilled by it), ‘vandalising’ her desk (because there wasn’t enough space on the piece of paper to draw) and standing by the classroom window waiting for street musicians to pass by or talking to swallows. Her mother, although probably alarmed about the

No wonder

According to a poll of about 300 people, reported in yesterday's Sunday Times, (how come nobody ever asks me these things?) , the Seven Wonders of Singapore are (in order of merit): 1. The Esplanade (a whopping 82 votes) 2. Changi Airport (53 votes) 3. Sentosa 4. The Merlion 5. The Singapore River 6. Food 7. Mount Faber and LKY (tie - 10 votes each) Some 'offbeat choices' which didn't make it to the top 7: aunties selling tissue paper at coffee shops, Singlish, kiasuism, 4D-Toto outlets and Newater (said someone of Newater: 'We are probably the only country with branded recycled sewage.' Well said, ha ha.). Maybe it's a personal bias but I feel that a 'Wonder' must also have strong historical and cultural/social value (so I'm rather miffed that Angkor Wat didn't make it to the 7 Wonders of the World; in fact it was never in the running for the top 7). Therefore, these choices are a little too modern for me. The Esplanade, for example, is a