Skip to main content

Suspicious Partner (2017)


A clever combination of characters and actors, well-constructed juxtaposition of comedy and serious court cases, strong leads Nam Ji-hyun (Bong-hee) and Ji Chang-wook (Ji-wook), and a compelling main villain (Dong Ha playing Hyun-soo) make this very entertaining.



Ji-wook’s law firm team is hilarious trying to work together.  It is so funny how Mr Bang refers to Eun-hyuk (Choi Tae-joon) and Ji-wook’s adoptive father Mr Byun (Lee Deok-hwa) as his children!  Throwing Bong-hee in the mix makes the group even funnier and the little boy Jae-hong (Kim Ye-jun) sitting in their meetings is the icing on the cake.



Realising that Hyun-soo is a serial murderer makes him creepier and creepier as the episodes go by.  Dong Ha does an excellent job in this role.  I don’t think I felt much sympathy for him, which some people did, but you could understand how he turned out this way.


when the murderer is a mild, friendly kind of guy

when the murderer in him comes to the fore

Ji-hyun is a natural comic and was just 21 when she did this show – very impressive!  It was my first time watching Ji Chang-wook and Choi Tae-joon (without realising then that he is the one who married Park Shin-hye!), who are both also very competent actors and well-suited for comedy.  The weak link for me was Kwon Nara, acting flatly as the very flat character Yoo-jung.  I could not see how Eun-hyuk could like her for so many years.  Ji-hae is a far more interesting character, much better played by Kim Ye-won, and should have won the mini battle for Eun-hyuk.  


cute how the girls end up based in Ji-hae's apartment


I liked how the friendship theme came through the four guys, who were funny, supportive, loyal and sensitive to each other’s worries and needs. Excellent job there!  



There were many funny scenes and my favourite one was when Bong-hee tells Ji-wook that she heard someone whistling the eerie ‘murderer’s tune’, as I will call it, then whistles it so poorly he cannot make it out!


who's whistling that tune??


whee...whee...whee...

 

this is a tune?


Now for my questions about some legal aspects of the show:

- It is okay for ladies to wear ‘formal’ shorts to work as a prosecutor?

- How could the District Attorney get away with so many illegal actions – false accusations of Bong-hee’s father, manipulation of the young Ji-wook, releasing the group of rapists who were influential people’s sons, and planting evidence to incriminate Bong-hee? Anyone could tell that Bong-hee was innocent so why did everyone keep saying she killed his son?  Just because of his amateurish piece of ‘evidence’?

- How can Ji-wook prosecute his former intern (Bong-hee), and the guy whom he had previously defended as a lawyer and who later stabbed both him and Mr Bang (Hyun-soo)?  Surely there is too conflict of interest here?

 

Apart from making one scratch one’s head over the laxity of the legal system, this is a very amusing and intriguing show.



20 episodes, SBS

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A lesson in love

I am a little pencil in the hand of a writing God who is sending a love letter to the world. -Mother Teresa Most of the time my eyes just glaze over when I see article upon article of football news. One caught my glazing eye over the weekend, though - 'De la Cruz - Mother Theresa in boots' , because of the familiar name. Mother Teresa, that is. It was the first time I’d ever heard of this de la Cruz guy, an EPL player who hails from Ecuador (GNI per capita US$2,630; as a comparison, Singapore’s is US$27, 490 – source: BBC country profiles ). His is a great story to illustrate that famous Chinese saying about not forgetting your roots. According to the article, ‘Each month a proportion of that salary (about S$150,000) Reading pay him - be it 10 per cent in January or 20 per cent in February - goes direct to the village’ (where he grew up). (Picture and profile from here ) Here's what he has been credited for: 1. 'The 2002 World Cup,' de la Cruz reflects, 'finan

True train school

‘Having eyes, but not seeing beauty; having ears, but not hearing music; having minds, but not perceiving truth; having hearts that are never moved and therefore never set on fire. These are the things to fear, said the headmaster.’ How would you like to have such a headmaster? I finally re-read (read it first as a teenager) Totto-chan, The Little Girl at the Window , a ‘school story’ by Tetsuko Kuroyanagi, translated by Dorothy Britton. Totto-chan is the name Tesuko Kuroyanagi called herself, and the book is about her life during her school days at Tomoe Gakuen. Totto-chan was expelled from her first elementary school because of her ‘disruptive’ behaviour, which included constantly opening and closing her desk top (because she was so thrilled by it), ‘vandalising’ her desk (because there wasn’t enough space on the piece of paper to draw) and standing by the classroom window waiting for street musicians to pass by or talking to swallows. Her mother, although probably alarmed about the

No wonder

According to a poll of about 300 people, reported in yesterday's Sunday Times, (how come nobody ever asks me these things?) , the Seven Wonders of Singapore are (in order of merit): 1. The Esplanade (a whopping 82 votes) 2. Changi Airport (53 votes) 3. Sentosa 4. The Merlion 5. The Singapore River 6. Food 7. Mount Faber and LKY (tie - 10 votes each) Some 'offbeat choices' which didn't make it to the top 7: aunties selling tissue paper at coffee shops, Singlish, kiasuism, 4D-Toto outlets and Newater (said someone of Newater: 'We are probably the only country with branded recycled sewage.' Well said, ha ha.). Maybe it's a personal bias but I feel that a 'Wonder' must also have strong historical and cultural/social value (so I'm rather miffed that Angkor Wat didn't make it to the 7 Wonders of the World; in fact it was never in the running for the top 7). Therefore, these choices are a little too modern for me. The Esplanade, for example, is a