Skip to main content

A Good Day To Be a Dog

Cute dogs!  Cute Hae-na!  Cute Hae-na’s family!  Cute couple!  Cha Eunwoo’s cute face!






All the dogs deserve praise and of course the two main ones should be singled out for more doggy treats!  However, there was too much use of CGI and the dogs looked too fake in those moments.



Park Gyu-young (Han Hae-na) is delightful in this and so is Cocoa, as well as Hae-na’s voiceovers when she is in dog form.  I think there is a template used for actresses people don’t like – it says that so-and-so will never be a good actress, she has only one facial expression the whole time and has no chemistry with the male lead.  I saw a couple of such comments about Gyu-young for this show, but I’ve seen almost exactly the same points made about Shin Se-kyung, Moon Ga-young, Nam Ji-hyun and Park Eun-bin.  Well, people copying and pasting these comments, I don’t agree with you at all! 



Eunwoo (Seo-won) is the one with a single facial expression but his handsome face sometimes makes you overlook his weak acting.  Ha.  I would love to see his acting improve but I don’t see this yet, though there are fans who believe it has happened.  You can tell he takes his work seriously, so I hope his efforts pay off eventually.  To his credit, he put dog treats in his mouth so that he could kiss Cocoa properly.  How many actors would do this?! (He said the dog treat tasted awful.)  Other than that, it was like replaying a diluted True Beauty, with him as a teacher now.  He hardly contributes to the humour except for the time he played the absolutely boring black and white film to get Bo-gyeom (Lee Hyun-woo) and Yool (Yoon Hyun-soo) sleepy!




Hae-na’s immediate family is very amusing when they appear as a family – didn’t think any of them was all that funny individually.  Ryu Abel has a far better role here than she did in Run On but I think she overplayed her portrayal of Yoo-na.  This was probably the only time I thought Jung Young-joo (the mum) had a decent character to play.  By far, Jo Jin-se did a better job than the family, natural and funny as old friend Woo-taek.




Uncle golden retriever (Kim Hae-joon) was hilarious and so expressive.  I especially liked the scene where he was talking non-stop after getting his speaking skills back and the family was tired out listening to him!  Scene stealer Level 2, along with the dogs!



Scene stealer #1 is Kim Yi-kyung, playing Ji-A – fantastic job with the mysterious, shaman-ish mystique, and it's cute that she becomes pally with Yool and Jin-seo (Shin Joon-hang).  She easily took on the sageuk aura, too.  It was just that Cho-young was a totally BLAND character.  She was such an aunty, although young!  I’m not sure why she doesn’t appear in the promotional events with Gyu-young, Eunwoo and Hyun-woo.  She should!  I feel she is the heroine of the story, saving everyone by saving Bo-gyeom from himself.  After centuries, finally a voice of reason tells him to let go and move on.



The tiger-mountain spirit is a most childish, mean-spirited spirit (who doesn’t look like a tiger at all)!  All he needed to do was to find out how exactly Cho-young died, which should not be too tough for a mountain spirit, but no, he just launches himself into bitterness and vengeance.  To think that after generations of [Hae-na and Seo-won] routinely getting together, he STILL wants to carry out his revenge!  His curse is stupid and unwarranted.  It isn’t explained in the show why he shows up now and then to protect or avenge the couple, such as against Seo-won’s bully.  Additionally, the two bully segments don’t fuse well with the rest of the story in the first place.  



At least the vice-principal fox spirit (Yoo Seung-mok) is funny!

 

A major complaint I have is the inappropriate teacher-student combinations. I thought Hae-na is too close to Yool, and that it was plain wrong to have Yool handling little Cocoa-his teacher, AND to have the dog-teacher sleeping in his room, where Hae-na will awake without clothes on!  The Bo-gyeom and Ji-A combi is worse.  Why have Cho-young come back as a student when she has to talk to Bo-gyeom as an ex??  Nothing terrible happened in these situations in the end but they just don’t sit right.



 

My other big complaint is the constant repetition of scenes.  Yes, there were many instances when scenes had to be repeated because new info was being inserted but there were too many of these, not to mention the scenes that were repeated for nothing.  Once more, we have students performing the content of the show that we already spent weeks watching!  Oh dear, have we run out of ideas for student performances or what?  Why not have Hae-na use more imagination and script a sageuk-esque skit, for example?


 

Overall, though, this was a very enjoyable show, and I also loved all the sweaters, cardis and Hae-na’s tops!  They added a lot to the pretty, colourful and lively, well-composed visual tapestry of the plot. 



A good day to be a dog

14 episodes, MBC

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

True train school

‘Having eyes, but not seeing beauty; having ears, but not hearing music; having minds, but not perceiving truth; having hearts that are never moved and therefore never set on fire. These are the things to fear, said the headmaster.’ How would you like to have such a headmaster? I finally re-read (read it first as a teenager) Totto-chan, The Little Girl at the Window , a ‘school story’ by Tetsuko Kuroyanagi, translated by Dorothy Britton. Totto-chan is the name Tesuko Kuroyanagi called herself, and the book is about her life during her school days at Tomoe Gakuen. Totto-chan was expelled from her first elementary school because of her ‘disruptive’ behaviour, which included constantly opening and closing her desk top (because she was so thrilled by it), ‘vandalising’ her desk (because there wasn’t enough space on the piece of paper to draw) and standing by the classroom window waiting for street musicians to pass by or talking to swallows. Her mother, although probably alarmed about the ...

No wonder

According to a poll of about 300 people, reported in yesterday's Sunday Times, (how come nobody ever asks me these things?) , the Seven Wonders of Singapore are (in order of merit): 1. The Esplanade (a whopping 82 votes) 2. Changi Airport (53 votes) 3. Sentosa 4. The Merlion 5. The Singapore River 6. Food 7. Mount Faber and LKY (tie - 10 votes each) Some 'offbeat choices' which didn't make it to the top 7: aunties selling tissue paper at coffee shops, Singlish, kiasuism, 4D-Toto outlets and Newater (said someone of Newater: 'We are probably the only country with branded recycled sewage.' Well said, ha ha.). Maybe it's a personal bias but I feel that a 'Wonder' must also have strong historical and cultural/social value (so I'm rather miffed that Angkor Wat didn't make it to the 7 Wonders of the World; in fact it was never in the running for the top 7). Therefore, these choices are a little too modern for me. The Esplanade, for example, is a...

He like dat say one meh?

Apparently, that 'English as it is broken' book has been topping the charts at our local bookstores. Actually, I'm not too interested in that book but this other one may be worth getting my hands on. The article about it, as published in Saturday's (1 Sept) ST: In the world of international diplomacy, the best-chosen words or phrases can leave an audience laughing, bewildered or simply lost in translation, an insider has revealed. Undiplomatic Activities, a yet-to-be-launched book by Mr Richard Woolcott, who ran Australia's foreign service for four years, points to the pitfalls of translating thoughts into different languages. Take the Australian diplomat in France who tried to tell his audience that as he looked back on his career, it was divided in two parts, with dull postings before life in Paris. 'When I look at my backside, I find it is divided into two parts,' Mr Woolcott quoted the diplomat as telling his highly amused audience. Ex-Australian prime m...